NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library

NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library

NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library

The medical spa I work at has recently started offering platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatments. Vendors state that PRP is a natural means of rejuvenating the skin. I wanted to see if I could find studies that support this claim. Du and Lei (2020) conducted a study assessing the molecular action of PRP on the skin. The study proved that PRP improves skin condition by increasing skin thickness and collagen and reducing hyperpigmentation, proving it is an effective antiaging treatment (Du & Lei, 2020). Everts et al. (2019) conducted a study testing the effectiveness of PRP on facial rejuvenation. The study revealed that PRP injections yield significant skin rejuvenation, proving to be a highly effective treatment for facial rejuvenation (Everts et al., 2019). I can now confidently suggest PRP injections for those seeking facial rejuvenation.

I searched by subject from the library homepage and picked nursing as the subject type. I then searched for articles using the keywords of platelet-rich plasma and rejuvenation. I filtered the search by limiting it to the last five years and peer-reviewed scholarly journals. Most scholarly journals are peer-reviewed (Walden University, n.d.). Databases most appropriate for a search in nursing include CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Proquest, and PubMed (Walden University, n.d.). CINAHL and MEDLINE have many nursing-related peer-reviewed articles, evidence-based practice reports, case studies, and systematic reviews (Walden University, n.d.). Embase is a robust database for drug and pharmacology information (Walden University, n.d.). I filtered my search further to include all the above databases and Academic Search Complete. I included the Academic Search Complete database because it consists of peer-reviewed journals, conference papers, newspapers, and magazines on various subject matters (Walden University, n.d.).

A difficulty I experienced while searching for the article was that it is not always clear whether a source is primary or secondary. I had to read through some articles to determine if they were primary or secondary sources. A primary source is any material that documents original research, theory, ideas, or experiences (Walden University, 2022). Secondary sources typically review primary sources (Walden University, 2022). I would highly recommend the above databases as they would be helpful to other graduate nursing students or nurse researchers because they are focused on journals in the medical field.

Relates Posts:

NURS 6003 Module 3 Research Analysis

NURS 6003 The Connection Between Academic And Professional Integrity

NURS 6003 Discussion Networking Opportunities

References

Du, R., & Lei, T. (2020). Effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma injections on facial skin rejuvenation. Experimental & Therapeutic Medicine, 19(4), 3024–3030. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8531

Everts, P. A., Pinto, P. C., & Girão, L. (2019). Autologous pure platelet-rich plasma injections for facial skin rejuvenation: Biometric instrumental evaluations and patient-reported outcomes to support antiaging effects. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 18(4), 985–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12802

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved September 17, 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=1998

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved September 17, 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

Walden University. (2022). What are primary and secondary sources? Retrieved September 17, 2022, from https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72620

REPLY QUOTE EMAIL AUTHOR

Bottom of Form

Hide 6 replies

2 months ago

Maria Ham 

RE: Discussion – Week 4

COLLAPSE

Top of Form

Hello Kara,

Thank you for the information you provided through your search for evidence-based research. I have heard of treatments involving platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and was very curious to look into your selected article’s findings and to see it well supported by the literature. Thank you for bringing light to an excellent treatment option. Have you heard of these therapies utilized in biological dentistry, reproductive medicine, or orthopedics? What cool stuff! I am six months out from a surgical tendon and ligament repair and considering such a treatment to help my healing process. In briefly reviewing some of the research, I found an abstract that reported the following: there are tendons in the body that respond well to PRP and tendons that do not show a beneficial improvement with PRP (Filardo et al., 2018).

Additionally, thank you for giving a review of primary and secondary sources. Were you able to find if this was an area you could specify filter-wise while working on any of the databases you utilized? I would imagine that what could be done is to find a database that allows you to filter results so that only primary sources are retrieved, like journal articles. One could also filter by type of study, specifically those that are published by those persons doing the research.

Embase is not a database that I have utilized before. In learning more about it, I found that it is the second most popular database after MEDLINE and, because of its features, is a potential “one-stop” search engine for medical research (Oliveira, 2021).

Additionally, you described searching with Boolean techniques when explaining how you found your research, and also as a response to my initial post. Thank you for a reminder and re-education on this important step to search information set-up. The following is what I was able to review. Utilizing Boolean operators while searching a database can be crucial to focusing on a topic and retrieving more accurate search topics (Adams, n.d.). There are ways to utilize parenthesis or nesting and operators such as: and, or, not, to help define a search. Using truncation (an asterisk) helps extend a database search and discover additional retrievals if your word may have different endings. I plan to become more familiar with these techniques as a strategy to improve my database searches.

Before starting this course, I reviewed several papers I wrote during my Bachelor’s program regarding evidence-based research. I feel that I have forgotten much of what I learned regarding research analysis. I was very grateful to be focusing on research analysis this week, as I feel that this understanding is essential when reviewing research and evaluating literature to be used as a resource.

References

Adams, D. (n.d.). LibGuides: Literature Searching: Searching techniques: using Boolean. Libguides.dundee.ac.uk. https://libguides.dundee.ac.uk/literaturesearching/searchtechniquesboolean

Filardo, G., Di Matteo, B., Kon, E., Merli, G., & Marcacci, M. (2018). Platelet-rich plasma in tendon-related disorders: results and indications. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 26(7), 1984–1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4261-4

Oliveira, I. de. (2021). Literature searches: What databases are available? Students 4 Best Evidence. https://s4be.cochrane.org/blog/2021/04/06/main-databases-for-literature-search/

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library

REPLY QUOTE EMAIL AUTHOR

My goal as an MSN student is to one day become an Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner. The peer-review article I chose is titled “Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Students’ Perceptions of a Debriefing Experience After a Cardiac Emergency High-Fidelity Simulation: A Qualitative Study” (2021). This article can be found in AACN Advanced Critical Care, a journal published by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (2021). As nurses advance their role to becoming acute care nurse practitioners, they need specialized training to prepare them. This study uses a qualitative approach to explore students’ perceptions on whether simulation on emergent situations and debriefing experiences would grow their leadership-related learning abilities (Ali et al., 2021).
Because online search databases typically contain only abstracts, I found it difficult to locate a peer-reviewed journal article in its entirety unless subscribed to that database. Also, after using Walden’s database, I had a hard time locating an article that was recently published, and pertinent to advanced practice nursing in a critical care setting. I am a member of AACN and I have utilized its evidence-based resources for many purposes throughout my career. Experts explain that evidence-based practice is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research (Al-Jundi & Sakka, 2017). The AACN is a useful database for students and professionals because it is a professional organization that provides peer-reviewed research that is evidence-based as well as carefully evaluated healthcare information by the guidance of fully qualified experts. This database also includes research and data services that are centered around baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs.
The “AACN Scope and Standards for Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice” describes and measures the expected level of practice and professional performance for acute care nurse practitioners and offers a practical tool for students, educators, and advanced practice nurses caring for high acuity or critically ill patients and their families (AACN, 2021). Therefore, I would recommend this database to my colleagues who have a goal is becoming an acute care nurse practitioner one day.

References
Ali, A. A., Miller, E., Musallam, E., & Ballman, K. (2021). Acute care nurse practitioner students’ perceptions of a debriefing experience after a cardiac emergency high-fidelity simulation: A qualitative study. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 32(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2021376
American Association of Critical Care Nurses. (2021). AACN Scope and Standards for Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice. https://www.aacn.org/nursing-excellence/standards/aacn-scope-and-standards-for-acute-care-nurse-practitioner-practice.
White, T., Kokiousis, J., Ensminger, S., & Shirey, M. (2017). Supplementing intensivist staffing with nurse practitioners. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017949

Discussion: Using the Walden Library
Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library

To Prepare:
• Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
• Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.
By Day 3 of Week 4
Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
By Day 6 of Week 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.

NURS 6003 Discussion Using the Walden Library – NursingPaperSlayers

RE: Discussion – Week 4
Collapse
The most straightforward way to identify a peer-reviewed article is to use one of the University Library’s numerous databases that are available to students who are interested in scholarly research (Walden University Library, n.d.). In research and according to Walden University (n.d.) t is vital to find more peer-reviewed publications that have been validated and probed for originality and validity when seeking for articles for any scholarly writing or literature. It has always been my interest to apply using nursing diagnosis in the holistic treatment of mentally ill patients, which entails assessing their needs and producing a clear plan of care that includes establishing the diagnosis and building strategies to implement the planned care for improved outcomes.
The PubMed database which I used helped me to easily locate an article titled Nursing Diagnoses Related to Psychiatric Adult Inpatient Care by Frauenfelder et al. (2018), which taught me a lot more about evidence-based practice for the speciality I chose. I had no trouble finding it because the database (PubMed) allows for a search that involves using criteria to find an article based on publication date, article kind, text availability, and other factors. The researcher’s task of locating the right article for the intended analysis is made significantly easier as a result of this. I would recommend this database to my colleagues because it is simple to use and can provide the exact information that a researcher needs by using the available filters and limiters.
References:
Frauenfelder, F., van Achterberg, T., & Muller Staub, M. (2018). Nursing diagnoses related to psychiatric adult inpatient care. Journal of clinical nursing, 27(3-4), e463–e475. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13959
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Verify peer review. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/verifypeerreview
Walden University. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. https://academicguideswaldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly

Making Use of the Walden Library

Where can you look for evidence to support your ideas and scholarly writing? You will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights throughout your degree program. It is critical to use peer-reviewed and scholarly journal resources when searching the research literature. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have previously found useful. For this Discussion, you will look into the databases available at the Walden Library.

Unless otherwise specified, initial Discussions postings are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You must take part in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is critical to stick to the weekly time frame so that others have enough time to respond to your posting. Furthermore, you are expected to respond to questions about your initial posting in a timely manner.

https://nursingpaperslayers.com/nurs-6003-discussion-using-the-walden-library/

To Get Ready:

Examine the Learning Resources for information on using the Walden Library, searching databases, and evaluating online resources.

Begin your search for a peer-reviewed article that is relevant to your practice area and of interest to you.

By Week 4’s third day

Put up the following:

Cite the peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you, using proper APA formatting, and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Describe any difficulties you encountered while looking for this article. Would your coworkers benefit from this database? Explain why you think this is the case or why you think it isn’t. Would you recommend this database to others? Explain why you think this is the case or why you think it isn’t.

By Week 4’s Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by providing suggestions/strategies for working with this database based on your own experience, or by suggesting alternative resources.

Click the Reply button to the right to reveal the textbox where you can enter your message. Then, to post your message, click the Submit button.

More Assignments:

NURS 6003 Developing An Academic And Professional Network

NURS 6003 Week 10 Examining Nursing Specialties

NURS 6003 Discussion Strategies For Academic Portfolios