NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library
NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library
NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library
The medical spa I work at has recently started offering platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatments. Vendors state that PRP is a natural means of rejuvenating the skin. I wanted to see if I could find studies that support this claim. Du and Lei (2020) conducted a study assessing the molecular action of PRP on the skin. The study proved that PRP improves skin condition by increasing skin thickness and collagen and reducing hyperpigmentation, proving it is an effective antiaging treatment (Du & Lei, 2020). Everts et al. (2019) conducted a study testing the effectiveness of PRP on facial rejuvenation. The study revealed that PRP injections yield significant skin rejuvenation, proving to be a highly effective treatment for facial rejuvenation (Everts et al., 2019). I can now confidently suggest PRP injections for those seeking facial rejuvenation.
I searched by subject from the library homepage and picked nursing as the subject type. I then searched for articles using the keywords of platelet-rich plasma and rejuvenation. I filtered the search by limiting it to the last five years and peer-reviewed scholarly journals. Most scholarly journals are peer-reviewed (Walden University, n.d.). Databases most appropriate for a search in nursing include CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Proquest, and PubMed (Walden University, n.d.). CINAHL and MEDLINE have many nursing-related peer-reviewed articles, evidence-based practice reports, case studies, and systematic reviews (Walden University, n.d.). Embase is a robust database for drug and pharmacology information (Walden University, n.d.). I filtered my search further to include all the above databases and Academic Search Complete. I included the Academic Search Complete database because it consists of peer-reviewed journals, conference papers, newspapers, and magazines on various subject matters (Walden University, n.d.).
A difficulty I experienced while searching for the article was that it is not always clear whether a source is primary or secondary. I had to read through some articles to determine if they were primary or secondary sources. A primary source is any material that documents original research, theory, ideas, or experiences (Walden University, 2022). Secondary sources typically review primary sources (Walden University, 2022). I would highly recommend the above databases as they would be helpful to other graduate nursing students or nurse researchers because they are focused on journals in the medical field.
References
Du, R., & Lei, T. (2020). Effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma injections on facial skin rejuvenation. Experimental & Therapeutic Medicine, 19(4), 3024–3030. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8531
Everts, P. A., Pinto, P. C., & Girão, L. (2019). Autologous pure platelet-rich plasma injections for facial skin rejuvenation: Biometric instrumental evaluations and patient-reported outcomes to support antiaging effects. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 18(4), 985–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12802
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved September 17, 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=1998
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved September 17, 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Walden University. (2022). What are primary and secondary sources? Retrieved September 17, 2022, from https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72620
Bottom of Form
2 months ago
Maria Ham
RE: Discussion – Week 4
Top of Form
Hello Kara,
Thank you for the information you provided through your search for evidence-based research. I have heard of treatments involving platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and was very curious to look into your selected article’s findings and to see it well supported by the literature. Thank you for bringing light to an excellent treatment option. Have you heard of these therapies utilized in biological dentistry, reproductive medicine, or orthopedics? What cool stuff! I am six months out from a surgical tendon and ligament repair and considering such a treatment to help my healing process. In briefly reviewing some of the research, I found an abstract that reported the following: there are tendons in the body that respond well to PRP and tendons that do not show a beneficial improvement with PRP (Filardo et al., 2018).
Additionally, thank you for giving a review of primary and secondary sources. Were you able to find if this was an area you could specify filter-wise while working on any of the databases you utilized? I would imagine that what could be done is to find a database that allows you to filter results so that only primary sources are retrieved, like journal articles. One could also filter by type of study, specifically those that are published by those persons doing the research.
Embase is not a database that I have utilized before. In learning more about it, I found that it is the second most popular database after MEDLINE and, because of its features, is a potential “one-stop” search engine for medical research (Oliveira, 2021).
Additionally, you described searching with Boolean techniques when explaining how you found your research, and also as a response to my initial post. Thank you for a reminder and re-education on this important step to search information set-up. The following is what I was able to review. Utilizing Boolean operators while searching a database can be crucial to focusing on a topic and retrieving more accurate search topics (Adams, n.d.). There are ways to utilize parenthesis or nesting and operators such as: and, or, not, to help define a search. Using truncation (an asterisk) helps extend a database search and discover additional retrievals if your word may have different endings. I plan to become more familiar with these techniques as a strategy to improve my database searches.
Before starting this course, I reviewed several papers I wrote during my Bachelor’s program regarding evidence-based research. I feel that I have forgotten much of what I learned regarding research analysis. I was very grateful to be focusing on research analysis this week, as I feel that this understanding is essential when reviewing research and evaluating literature to be used as a resource.
References
Adams, D. (n.d.). LibGuides: Literature Searching: Searching techniques: using Boolean. Libguides.dundee.ac.uk. https://libguides.dundee.ac.uk/literaturesearching/searchtechniquesboolean
Filardo, G., Di Matteo, B., Kon, E., Merli, G., & Marcacci, M. (2018). Platelet-rich plasma in tendon-related disorders: results and indications. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 26(7), 1984–1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4261-4
Oliveira, I. de. (2021). Literature searches: What databases are available? Students 4 Best Evidence. https://s4be.cochrane.org/blog/2021/04/06/main-databases-for-literature-search/
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library
Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.
To Prepare:
• Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
• Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.
By Day 3 of Week 4
Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
By Day 6 of Week 4
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.
Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.
KELLY
RE: Discussion – Week 4
Collapse
My goal as an MSN student is to one day become an Adult-Gerontology Acute Care Nurse Practitioner. The peer-review article I chose is titled “Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Students’ Perceptions of a Debriefing Experience After a Cardiac Emergency High-Fidelity Simulation: A Qualitative Study” (2021). This article can be found in AACN Advanced Critical Care, a journal published by the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (2021). As nurses advance their role to becoming acute care nurse practitioners, they need specialized training to prepare them. This study uses a qualitative approach to explore students’ perceptions on whether simulation on emergent situations and debriefing experiences would grow their leadership-related learning abilities (Ali et al., 2021).
Because online search databases typically contain only abstracts, I found it difficult to locate a peer-reviewed journal article in its entirety unless subscribed to that database. Also, after using Walden’s database, I had a hard time locating an article that was recently published, and pertinent to advanced practice nursing in a critical care setting. I am a member of AACN and I have utilized its evidence-based resources for many purposes throughout my career. Experts explain that evidence-based practice is the integration of individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research (Al-Jundi & Sakka, 2017). The AACN is a useful database for students and professionals because it is a professional organization that provides peer-reviewed research that is evidence-based as well as carefully evaluated healthcare information by the guidance of fully qualified experts. This database also includes research and data services that are centered around baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs.
The “AACN Scope and Standards for Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice” describes and measures the expected level of practice and professional performance for acute care nurse practitioners and offers a practical tool for students, educators, and advanced practice nurses caring for high acuity or critically ill patients and their families (AACN, 2021). Therefore, I would recommend this database to my colleagues who have a goal is becoming an acute care nurse practitioner one day.
References
Ali, A. A., Miller, E., Musallam, E., & Ballman, K. (2021). Acute care nurse practitioner students’ perceptions of a debriefing experience after a cardiac emergency high-fidelity simulation: A qualitative study. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 32(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2021376
American Association of Critical Care Nurses. (2021). AACN Scope and Standards for Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Practice. https://www.aacn.org/nursing-excellence/standards/aacn-scope-and-standards-for-acute-care-nurse-practitioner-practice.
White, T., Kokiousis, J., Ensminger, S., & Shirey, M. (2017). Supplementing intensivist staffing with nurse practitioners. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017949
RESPOND HERE (150 WORDS, 3 REFERENCES)
This is insightful Kelly, the article selected, “Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Students’ Perceptions of a Debriefing Experience after a Cardiac Emergency High-Fidelity Simulation: A Qualitative Study” (2021), is relevant to the topic or area of study. Specialized training is necessary for the nurses who want to advance their roles in acute care (Ali et al., 2021). The article contains essential information required in the course or the area of study. From the article, the abstract only contain basic information about the topic under the study. However, the article can be accessed from the link provided (White et al., 2017). The full article contain advanced information and data required for the entire study. The full document also contain comprehensive information about the topic under the study. Walden University database contain numerous articles that can be applied to research about the same topic (Bramer et al., 2018). To determine the exact article required in the research processes, the application of keywords or phrases is essential. These keywords provided direct link to the document required.
References
Ali, A. A., Miller, E., Musallam, E., & Ballman, K. (2021). Acute care nurse practitioner students’ perceptions of a debriefing experience after a cardiac emergency high-fidelity simulation: A qualitative study. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 32(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2021376
Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 531. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6148622/
White, T., Kokiousis, J., Ensminger, S., & Shirey, M. (2017). Supplementing intensivist staffing with nurse practitioners. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017949
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Using the Walden Library

CLARICEL
RE: Discussion – Week 4
Collapse
Peer-Reviewed Article on COVID-19 and Mental Health in the United States
The significant impact of the pandemic on the population’s mental health has been one of the main reasons I pursued my MSN in Psychiatric-Mental Health degree. Its effects on individuals from all walks of life, regardless of race and gender, have been hard to ignore. For this discussion, the article I chose is titled COVID-19 and mental health equity in the United States by Purtle (2020). In this journal, the author discussed that socially disadvantaged groups like those in the low-income brackets and those belonging to racial/ethnic minorities experienced more pandemic-related psychiatric illnesses (Purtle, 2020). Using the database APA PsycInfo, I keyed the words “COVID-19” and “mental health” on the first search field and “United States” on the second field. To expand my search, I included the Boolean “AND.” The search resulted in 470 articles. One setback I encountered was the vast number of articles I generated from my initial inquiry and narrowed my search. To focus my search, I used the “TI” Titles from the optional field, chose FullText, and publication years 2019 to 2021 as my limiters, resulting in 17 articles (Walden University Library, n.d.).
There are many valuable databases available for research and scientific studies. APA PsycInfo is one of them. Like many databases, it contains trusted and credible peer-reviewed articles. However, APA PsycInfo would be more beneficial for those pursuing studies on behavioral and social sciences as it has more choices of psychiatric journals than the MEDLINE database (Eady, Wilczynski, & Haynes, 2008). APA PsycInfo contains one of the most extensive selections, more than 5million scientific papers, focusing on this field (American Psychological Association, n.d.). Therefore, it would be a useful resource for anyone interested in this field of study. I would highly recommend this to my colleagues also pursuing MSN in Psychiatry-Mental Health.
References
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA PsycINFO – APA publishing | APA.
https://www.apa.org. https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo
Eady, A. M., Wilczynski, N. L., & Haynes, R. B. (2008). PsycINFO search strategies identified
methodologically sound therapy studies and review articles for use by clinicians and
researchers. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 61(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.016
Purtle, J. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health equity in the United States. Social Psychiatry
and Psychiatric Epidemiology: The International Journal for Research in Social and
Genetic Epidemiology and Mental Health Services, 55(8), 969–971. https://doi-
org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01896-8
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z:
Nursing. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
RESPOND HERE (150 WORDS, 3 REFERENCES)
This is insightful Claricel, the significant impact of the pandemic on the population’s mental health has been one of the main reasons I pursued my MSN in Psychiatric-Mental Health degree. Master of Science in Psychiatric-Mental Health is essential in gaining knowledge in evidence-based practices and the research processes in healthcare (American Psychological Association, n.d). The journal identified is relevant to the research topic or the topic under consideration. The journal can be accessed through the link that have been provided (Bramer et al., 2018). This link leads to a comprehensive information that can be applied in the gaining information about the topic under consideration (White et al., 2017). Walden university database contain numerous sources of information that can be applied in the research process. Using the keywords or phrases is necessary in finding the link to the relevant information that is needed. Apart from Walden University database, there is APA PsycInfo database that can be applied to identify information required. APA PsycInfo database contain relevant and credible information that can be applied in the research processes.
References
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA PsycINFO – APA publishing | APA.
https://www.apa.org. https://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo
White, T., Kokiousis, J., Ensminger, S., & Shirey, M. (2017). Supplementing intensivist staffing with nurse practitioners. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 28(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2017949
Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 531. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6148622/
Also Read:
NURS 6003 Describe Your Approach To Identifying And Analyzing Peer-Reviewed Research
NURS 6003 Discussion Post An Explanation Of Your Choice Of A Nursing Specialty Within The Program
NURS 6003 Transition Discussion Board Week 8
NURS 6003 Discussion Strategies For Academic Portfolios 1
NURS_6003_Module03_Week04_Discussion_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Posting | Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. | Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. | Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Main Post: Timeliness | Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3. |
First Response | Points Range: 17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. | Points Range: 15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. | Points Range: 13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Second Response | Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. | Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. | Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Participation | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
Total Points: 100 |
---|